Plenty of rocks.
Saturday, 9 February 2013
Naming the nameless.
It’s easier to tell a story if your characters have
names.
There were two alternatives for naming the Neanderthal people
in SONG HUNTER: I could either use meaningless words like Kalgot, Bonzol or
Smutch; or I could name the people after things they found around them in their
valley.
I decided to do the latter, and to make it easier for my
readers to keep track of who is who I decided on to split the names very obviously between
the women and the men. The men I named after animals: Elk, Bear, Lynx, and the
outsider Seal. That was easy.
The women had to be named after something else - but the
trouble was that they don’t really have much
else. There is grass and reeds and a few low shrubby trees.
Stars, the sun, the sky, the clouds. Shadows. Ice. Snow. Rocks.
Plenty of rocks.
Pebbles has already
been taken as a name for a stoneage little girl; and Boulder, Flint, Quartz and
Gravel don’t sound much like girls. But there are prettier stones that my
people might have come across: Pearl, Mica, Amber, Garnet.
O nce I had their names they began to speak to me.
Plenty of rocks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How lovely! And how true. You cannot do anything without naming people....an odd fact in itself. And often when you've named someone, they come to life instantly. Dickens (I know what you think of him) did half the work of characterisation through his names...
ReplyDeleteYes, and one does still use the Dickens system on some sort of level.
ReplyDeleteOf Garnet and Amber, for instance, it's quite obvious which is the kind one an which the shrew.